Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
358 kcal
Score
3 / 100
Altın kinoa has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
368 vs 358(-2.7%)
Score Diff
32 vs 3(-90.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Altın kinoa
Higher energy
Altın kinoa
Score leader
Altın kinoa
Nutrient split
17 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Altın kinoa and Tapyoka unu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal and Tapyoka unu has 358.0 kcal. The difference is 10.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 3. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Altın kinoa | Tapyoka unu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.36 mg | 0.005 mg | -98.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.49 mg | 0.008 mg | -98.4% |
| Bakir | 0.59 mg | 0.02 mg | -96.6% |
| Demir | 4.57 mg | 1.58 mg | -65.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 0.9 g | -87.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.44 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 368 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 457 mg | 7 mg | -98.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 47 mg | 12 mg | -74.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 64.16 g | 88.69 g | +38.2% |
| Kül | — | 0.11 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 197 mg | 1 mg | -99.5% |
| Mangan | 2 mg | 0.11 mg | -94.5% |
| Niasin | 1.52 mg | — | — |
| Nisasta | — | 86.8 g | — |
| Potasyum | 563 mg | 11 mg | -98.0% |
| Protein | 14.12 g | 0.19 g | -98.7% |
| Selenyum | 8.5 µg | 0.8 µg | -90.6% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 1 mg | -80.0% |
| Su | 13.28 g | 10.99 g | -17.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.005 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 184 µg | 4 µg | -97.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.07 g | 0.02 g | -99.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.1 g | 0.35 g | +250.0% |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 0.12 mg | -96.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Altın kinoa and Tapyoka unu.
Tapyoka unu has less energy per 100 g (358 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Altın kinoa has 0.1 g and Tapyoka unu has 0.35 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Altın kinoa 32, Tapyoka unu 3.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.