Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
446 kcal
Score
58 / 100
Soya Fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (58) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
368 vs 446(+21.2%)
Score Diff
32 vs 58(+81.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Soya Fasulyesi
Higher energy
Soya Fasulyesi
Score leader
Soya Fasulyesi
Nutrient split
4 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Altın kinoa and Soya Fasulyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal and Soya Fasulyesi has 446.0 kcal. The difference is 78.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 58. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Altın kinoa | Soya Fasulyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.36 mg | 0.87 mg | +141.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | 0.87 mg | +171.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.49 mg | 0.38 mg | -22.4% |
| Bakir | 0.59 mg | 1.66 mg | +181.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 6 mg | — |
| Demir | 4.57 mg | 15.7 mg | +243.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 9.3 g | +32.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.44 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 368 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 457 mg | 704 mg | +54.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 47 mg | 277 mg | +489.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 64.16 g | 30.16 g | -53.0% |
| Kül | — | 4.87 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 197 mg | 280 mg | +42.1% |
| Mangan | 2 mg | 2.52 mg | +26.0% |
| Niasin | 1.52 mg | 1.62 mg | +6.6% |
| Potasyum | 563 mg | 1797 mg | +219.2% |
| Protein | 14.12 g | 36.49 g | +158.4% |
| Selenyum | 8.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 2 mg | -60.0% |
| Su | 13.28 g | 8.54 g | -35.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 2.88 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 184 µg | 375 µg | +103.8% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.4 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.07 g | 19.94 g | +228.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 11.26 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 4.89 mg | +57.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Altın kinoa and Soya Fasulyesi.
Altın kinoa has less energy per 100 g (368 kcal versus 446 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Altın kinoa has 47 mg and Soya Fasulyesi has 277 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Altın kinoa 32, Soya Fasulyesi 58.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.