Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
364 kcal
Score
34 / 100
Koçbaşı Nohut has a higher nutrition quality score (34) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
368 vs 364(-1.1%)
Score Diff
32 vs 34(+6.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Koçbaşı Nohut
Higher energy
Altın kinoa
Score leader
Koçbaşı Nohut
Nutrient split
7 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Altın kinoa and Koçbaşı Nohut are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal and Koçbaşı Nohut has 364.0 kcal. The difference is 4.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 34. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Altın kinoa | Koçbaşı Nohut | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.36 mg | 0.477 mg | +32.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | 0.212 mg | -33.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.49 mg | 0.535 mg | +9.2% |
| Bakir | 0.59 mg | 0.85 mg | +44.1% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4 mg | — |
| Demir | 4.57 mg | 6.24 mg | +36.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 17.4 g | +148.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.44 mg | 0.35 mg | -85.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 368 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 457 mg | 366 mg | -19.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 47 mg | 105 mg | +123.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 64.16 g | 60.65 g | -5.5% |
| Kül | — | 2.51 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 197 mg | 115 mg | -41.6% |
| Mangan | 2 mg | 2.2 mg | +10.0% |
| Niasin | 1.52 mg | 1.54 mg | +1.3% |
| Potasyum | 563 mg | 875 mg | +55.4% |
| Protein | 14.12 g | 19.3 g | +36.7% |
| Selenyum | 8.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 24 mg | +380.0% |
| Su | 13.28 g | 11.5 g | -13.4% |
| Toplam Folat | 184 µg | 557 µg | +202.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.07 g | 6.04 g | -0.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 3.43 mg | +10.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Altın kinoa and Koçbaşı Nohut.
Koçbaşı Nohut has less energy per 100 g (364 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Altın kinoa has 5 mg and Koçbaşı Nohut has 24 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Altın kinoa 32, Koçbaşı Nohut 34.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.