Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
61 kcal
Score
43 / 100
Kivi has a higher nutrition quality score (43) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
53 vs 61(+15.1%)
Score Diff
41 vs 43(+4.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kivi
Higher energy
Kivi
Score leader
Kivi
Nutrient split
9 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) and Kivi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) has 53.0 kcal and Kivi has 61.0 kcal. The difference is 8.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 41 and 43. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) | Kivi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 36 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.027 mg | -75.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.025 mg | -37.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.063 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.056 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 432 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 11 mg | 92.7 mg | +742.7% |
| Demir | 1 mg | 0.31 mg | -69.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 4.8 g | 3 g | -37.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.46 mg | — |
| Enerji | 222 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | — | 61 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 40 mg | 34 mg | -15.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 40.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 34 mg | +277.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 11.2 g | 14.66 g | +30.9% |
| Kül | 0.8 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | — | 17 mg | — |
| Niasin | 2.8 mg | 0.341 mg | -87.8% |
| Potasyum | 170 mg | 312 mg | +83.5% |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 1.14 g | -40.0% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 3 mg | +200.0% |
| Su | 85.4 g | 83.07 g | -2.7% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 25 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.7 g | 0.52 g | -25.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 8.99 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.1 mg | 0.14 mg | +40.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) and Kivi.
Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) has less energy per 100 g (53 kcal versus 61 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) has 11 mg and Kivi has 92.7 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) 41, Kivi 43.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.