Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
884 kcal
Score
0 / 100
Alp fıstığı has a higher nutrition quality score (27) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
629 vs 884(+40.5%)
Score Diff
27 vs 0(-100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alp fıstığı
Higher energy
Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı
Score leader
Alp fıstığı
Nutrient split
8 - 4 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Alp fıstığı and Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Alp fıstığı has 629.0 kcal and Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı has 884.0 kcal. The difference is 255.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 27 and 0. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Alp fıstığı | Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | — | 0.76 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.36 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.23 mg | — | — |
| Beta-sitosterol | — | 184 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.8 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 5.5 mg | 0.56 mg | -89.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.7 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 9.3 mg | 14.35 mg | +54.3% |
| Fitosteroller | — | 221 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 34 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 575 mg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 60.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 1 mg | -93.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 13.1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 251 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | 8.8 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0.82 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 71.27 g | — |
| Niasin | 4.3 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 597 mg | 1 mg | -99.8% |
| Protein | 13.7 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 9.76 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 11 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 2.15 g | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 2 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 5.3 g | 0.2 g | -96.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.9 g | 13.81 g | +181.8% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 0.3 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 18.8 g | 72.96 g | +288.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 68.4 g | 100 g | +46.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 34.1 g | 10.52 g | -69.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0 g | — |
| Çinko | 6.4 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Alp fıstığı and Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı.
Alp fıstığı has less energy per 100 g (629 kcal versus 884 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Alp fıstığı has 18.8 g and Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı has 72.96 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Alp fıstığı 27, Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı 0.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.