Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) has a higher nutrition quality score (40) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
19.5 vs 263(+1248.7%)
Score Diff
40 vs 6(-85.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı)
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı)
Nutrient split
4 - 11 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) has 19.5 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 243.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 40 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.006 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.012 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | 0.04 mg | 0.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.8 mg | 8 mg | +344.4% |
| Demir | 0.25 mg | 0.4 mg | +60.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.1 g | 1.1 g | +1000.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 263 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 7.2 mg | 9 mg | +25.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 11 mg | 15 mg | +36.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.85 g | 68 g | +7900.0% |
| Kül | 0.35 g | 0.3 g | -14.3% |
| Magnezyum | 6.5 mg | 6 mg | -7.7% |
| Malik asit | 65 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | 0.07 mg | 0.15 mg | +114.3% |
| Niasin | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 88 mg | 77 mg | -12.5% |
| Protein | 0.15 g | 0.4 g | +166.7% |
| Sitrik asit | 18 mg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 12 mg | +200.0% |
| Su | 95.2 g | 30.2 g | -68.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.02 g | 0.1 g | +400.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.45 g | 60.3 g | +13300.0% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.08 mg | 0.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) and Ahududu reçeli.
Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) has less energy per 100 g (19.5 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) has 0.45 g and Ahududu reçeli has 60.3 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) 40, Ahududu reçeli 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.