Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ali Nazik Kebabı has a higher nutrition quality score (43) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
151.5 vs 342(+125.7%)
Score Diff
43 vs 19(-55.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ali Nazik Kebabı
Higher energy
Tarhana (Maraş Sıkma)
Score leader
Ali Nazik Kebabı
Nutrient split
3 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ali Nazik Kebabı and Tarhana (Maraş Sıkma) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ali Nazik Kebabı has 151.5 kcal and Tarhana (Maraş Sıkma) has 342.0 kcal. The difference is 190.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 19. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ali Nazik Kebabı | Tarhana (Maraş Sıkma) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 26 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.28 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.75 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.14 mg | 0.24 mg | +71.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.21 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.2 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.15 mg | 3.4 mg | +195.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.7 g | 6.2 g | +264.7% |
| Fosfor | 112 mg | 315 mg | +181.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 68 mg | 210 mg | +208.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.7 g | 63.4 g | +1012.3% |
| Kolesterol | 28 mg | — | — |
| Kül | — | 4.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 19 mg | 78 mg | +310.5% |
| Niasin | 2.2 mg | 3.1 mg | +40.9% |
| Potasyum | 275 mg | 380 mg | +38.2% |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 13.6 g | +61.9% |
| Sodyum | 345 mg | 1150 mg | +233.3% |
| Su | 74.2 g | 12.8 g | -82.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.1 g | 2.15 g | -47.6% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 38 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.92 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 10.2 g | 3.8 g | -62.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.55 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.5 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.35 mg | 2.1 mg | +55.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ali Nazik Kebabı and Tarhana (Maraş Sıkma).
Ali Nazik Kebabı has less energy per 100 g (151.5 kcal versus 342 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Ali Nazik Kebabı has 5.7 g and Tarhana (Maraş Sıkma) has 63.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ali Nazik Kebabı 43, Tarhana (Maraş Sıkma) 19.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.