Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
45 kcal
Score
50 / 100
Aleppo biberi has a higher nutrition quality score (77) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 45(-84.0%)
Score Diff
77 vs 50(-35.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Aleppo biberi
Higher energy
Aleppo biberi
Score leader
Aleppo biberi
Nutrient split
16 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Aleppo biberi and Wakame yosunu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Aleppo biberi has 282.0 kcal and Wakame yosunu has 45.0 kcal. The difference is 237.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 77 and 50. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Aleppo biberi | Wakame yosunu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1480 µg | 18 µg | -98.8% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.3 mg | 0.06 mg | -80.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.9 mg | 0.23 mg | -74.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.1 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.28 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 17000 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 75 mg | 3 mg | -96.0% |
| Demir | 14.5 mg | 2.18 mg | -85.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 27.2 g | 0.5 g | -98.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 28 mg | 1 mg | -96.4% |
| Fosfor | 290 mg | 80 mg | -72.4% |
| İyot | — | 4200 µg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 5.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 148 mg | 150 mg | +1.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 52 g | 9.14 g | -82.4% |
| Magnezyum | 152 mg | 107 mg | -29.6% |
| Mangan | — | 1.4 mg | — |
| Niasin | 8.7 mg | 1.6 mg | -81.6% |
| Potasyum | 1950 mg | 50 mg | -97.4% |
| Protein | 12 g | 3.03 g | -74.8% |
| Sodyum | 1600 mg | 872 mg | -45.5% |
| Su | 10.5 g | 80 g | +661.9% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 196 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 10 g | 0.64 g | -93.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 10.3 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 2.4 mg | 0.38 mg | -84.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Aleppo biberi and Wakame yosunu.
Wakame yosunu has less energy per 100 g (45 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Su, Aleppo biberi has 10.5 g and Wakame yosunu has 80 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Aleppo biberi 77, Wakame yosunu 50.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.