Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
285 kcal
Score
78 / 100
Nane (Kuru Nane) has a higher nutrition quality score (78) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 285(+1.1%)
Score Diff
77 vs 78(+1.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Nane (Kuru Nane)
Higher energy
Nane (Kuru Nane)
Score leader
Nane (Kuru Nane)
Nutrient split
9 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Aleppo biberi and Nane (Kuru Nane) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Aleppo biberi has 282.0 kcal and Nane (Kuru Nane) has 285.0 kcal. The difference is 3.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 77 and 78. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Aleppo biberi | Nane (Kuru Nane) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1480 µg | 529 µg | -64.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.3 mg | 0.29 mg | -3.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.9 mg | 1.42 mg | +57.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.1 mg | 2.58 mg | +22.9% |
| Bakir | — | 1.54 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 17000 µg | 6350 µg | -62.6% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 75 mg | 31.8 mg | -57.6% |
| Demir | 14.5 mg | 87.47 mg | +503.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 27.2 g | 29.8 g | +9.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 28 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 530 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 290 mg | 276 mg | -4.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 777.9 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 148 mg | 1488 mg | +905.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 52 g | 52.04 g | +0.1% |
| Kül | — | 10.67 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 152 mg | 271 mg | +78.3% |
| Mangan | — | 11.49 mg | — |
| Niasin | 8.7 mg | 6.56 mg | -24.6% |
| Potasyum | 1950 mg | 1924 mg | -1.3% |
| Protein | 12 g | 19.96 g | +66.3% |
| Sodyum | 1600 mg | 344 mg | -78.5% |
| Su | 10.5 g | 11.3 g | +7.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.58 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 10 g | 6.03 g | -39.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 10.3 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 2.4 mg | 2.41 mg | +0.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Aleppo biberi and Nane (Kuru Nane).
Aleppo biberi has less energy per 100 g (282 kcal versus 285 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Aleppo biberi has 148 mg and Nane (Kuru Nane) has 1488 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Aleppo biberi 77, Nane (Kuru Nane) 78.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.