Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
275 kcal
Score
79 / 100
Mantar tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (79) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 275(-2.5%)
Score Diff
77 vs 79(+2.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Mantar tozu
Higher energy
Aleppo biberi
Score leader
Mantar tozu
Nutrient split
8 - 7 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Aleppo biberi and Mantar tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Aleppo biberi has 282.0 kcal and Mantar tozu has 275.0 kcal. The difference is 7.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 77 and 79. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Aleppo biberi | Mantar tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1480 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.3 mg | 0.65 mg | +116.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.9 mg | 3.2 mg | +255.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.1 mg | 0.85 mg | -59.5% |
| Bakir | — | 3.5 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 17000 µg | — | — |
| Beta-glukan | — | 8.5 g | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 75 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 2.1 µg | — |
| Demir | 14.5 mg | 14.5 mg | 0.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 27.2 g | 22 g | -19.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 28 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 275 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 290 mg | 850 mg | +193.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 148 mg | 120 mg | -18.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 52 g | 48 g | -7.7% |
| Kül | — | 9.8 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 152 mg | 110 mg | -27.6% |
| Niasin | 8.7 mg | 38.5 mg | +342.5% |
| Potasyum | 1950 mg | 3100 mg | +59.0% |
| Protein | 12 g | 28.5 g | +137.5% |
| Selenyum | — | 78 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 1600 mg | 45 mg | -97.2% |
| Su | 10.5 g | 9.5 g | -9.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 10 g | 2.2 g | -78.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 10.3 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 2.4 mg | 7.2 mg | +200.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Aleppo biberi and Mantar tozu.
Mantar tozu has less energy per 100 g (275 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Niasin, Aleppo biberi has 8.7 mg and Mantar tozu has 38.5 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Aleppo biberi 77, Mantar tozu 79.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.