Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
158 kcal
Score
25 / 100
Tsukemen has a higher nutrition quality score (25) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
148 vs 158(+6.8%)
Score Diff
20 vs 25(+25.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tsukemen
Higher energy
Tsukemen
Score leader
Tsukemen
Nutrient split
9 - 8 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Aleesa and Tsukemen are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Aleesa has 148.0 kcal and Tsukemen has 158.0 kcal. The difference is 10.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 20 and 25. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Aleesa | Tsukemen | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | 0.12 mg | 0.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.45 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.08 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 1.1 mg | -8.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.1 g | 1.1 g | -47.6% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 148 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 115 mg | 85 mg | -26.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 22 mg | -8.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 18.5 g | 20.5 g | +10.8% |
| Kolesterol | 18 mg | 28 mg | +55.6% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 34 mg | 16 mg | -52.9% |
| Niasin | 2.3 mg | 1.8 mg | -21.7% |
| Potasyum | 185 mg | 145 mg | -21.6% |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 6.8 g | -20.0% |
| Selenyum | — | 11.2 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 275 mg | 540 mg | +96.4% |
| Su | 68.2 g | 71.5 g | +4.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.4 g | 1.8 g | +28.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.5 g | 2.1 g | +40.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 4.2 g | 5.4 g | +28.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.9 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.4 g | 1.4 g | +250.0% |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 0.85 mg | -22.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Aleesa and Tsukemen.
Aleesa has less energy per 100 g (148 kcal versus 158 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Aleesa has 0.4 g and Tsukemen has 1.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Aleesa 20, Tsukemen 25.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.