Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
125.4 kcal
Score
51 / 100
Arsik has a higher nutrition quality score (51) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
148 vs 125.4(-15.3%)
Score Diff
20 vs 51(+155.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Arsik
Higher energy
Aleesa
Score leader
Arsik
Nutrient split
4 - 11 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Aleesa and Arsik are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Aleesa has 148.0 kcal and Arsik has 125.4 kcal. The difference is 22.6 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 20 and 51. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Aleesa | Arsik | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 28 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 1.45 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4.8 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 1.2 mg | 0.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.1 g | 0.8 g | -61.9% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 148 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 115 mg | 185 mg | +60.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 48 mg | +100.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 18.5 g | 3.1 g | -83.2% |
| Kolesterol | 18 mg | 55 mg | +205.6% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 1.4 g | +16.7% |
| Magnezyum | 34 mg | 29 mg | -14.7% |
| Niasin | 2.3 mg | 2.3 mg | 0.0% |
| Potasyum | 185 mg | 325 mg | +75.7% |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 16.5 g | +94.1% |
| Selenyum | — | 14.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 275 mg | 340 mg | +23.6% |
| Su | 68.2 g | 73.2 g | +7.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.4 g | 1.15 g | -17.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.5 g | 2.1 g | +40.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 4.2 g | 5.2 g | +23.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.45 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.4 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 1.3 mg | +18.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Aleesa and Arsik.
Arsik has less energy per 100 g (125.4 kcal versus 148 kcal).
For measured Kolesterol, Aleesa has 18 mg and Arsik has 55 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Aleesa 20, Arsik 51.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Aleesa · Arsik · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.