Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
79.7 kcal
Score
71 / 100
Kuzu Kulağı Salatası has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
27 vs 79.7(+195.2%)
Score Diff
68 vs 71(+4.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuzu Kulağı Salatası
Higher energy
Kuzu Kulağı Salatası
Score leader
Kuzu Kulağı Salatası
Nutrient split
8 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Alabaş (Kohlrabi) and Kuzu Kulağı Salatası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 27.0 kcal and Kuzu Kulağı Salatası has 79.7 kcal. The difference is 52.7 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 68 and 71. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Alabaş (Kohlrabi) | Kuzu Kulağı Salatası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 150 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.129 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1800 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 62 mg | 35 mg | -43.5% |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 2.2 mg | +450.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.6 g | 2.1 g | -41.7% |
| Fosfor | 46 mg | 28 mg | -39.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 110 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 40 mg | +66.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.2 g | 3.8 g | -38.7% |
| Kül | 1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 19 mg | 85 mg | +347.4% |
| Mangan | 0.139 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 4.5 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | — | — |
| Oksalik asit | — | 300 mg | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.165 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 350 mg | 290 mg | -17.1% |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 1.5 g | -11.8% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 0.8 g | — |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 120 mg | +500.0% |
| Su | 91 g | 85.2 g | -6.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.013 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 16 µg | 12 µg | -25.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | 12.3 mg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 6.5 g | +6400.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.6 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.03 mg | 0.4 mg | +1233.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Alabaş (Kohlrabi) and Kuzu Kulağı Salatası.
Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has less energy per 100 g (27 kcal versus 79.7 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 0.1 g and Kuzu Kulağı Salatası has 6.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Alabaş (Kohlrabi) 68, Kuzu Kulağı Salatası 71.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.