Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
139 kcal
Score
71 / 100
Kuzu Ciğeri has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
146 vs 139(-4.8%)
Score Diff
60 vs 71(+18.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuzu Ciğeri
Higher energy
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı)
Score leader
Kuzu Ciğeri
Nutrient split
4 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Kuzu Ciğeri are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 146.0 kcal and Kuzu Ciğeri has 139.0 kcal. The difference is 7.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 60 and 71. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) | Kuzu Ciğeri | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 7400 µg | +19373.7% |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.4 µg | 85.7 µg | +3470.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 3.3 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.45 mg | 0.9 mg | +100.0% |
| Bakir | — | 6.8 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 4.2 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.8 mg | 7.4 mg | +825.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.52 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | — | 0 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 139 kcal | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.18 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 210 mg | 358 mg | +70.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 9 mg | -59.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 3.8 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 55 mg | 250 mg | +354.5% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 30 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 8.5 mg | 13.7 mg | +61.2% |
| Potasyum | 404 mg | 222 mg | -45.0% |
| Protein | 23.1 g | 20.4 g | -11.7% |
| Selenyum | 36.5 µg | 111 µg | +204.1% |
| Sodyum | 39 mg | 70 mg | +79.5% |
| Su | 70.5 g | 71.2 g | +1.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 230 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5.2 g | 5 g | -3.8% |
| Çinko | 0.6 mg | 4 mg | +566.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Kuzu Ciğeri.
Kuzu Ciğeri has less energy per 100 g (139 kcal versus 146 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 38 µg and Kuzu Ciğeri has 7400 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) 60, Kuzu Ciğeri 71.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.