Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
588 kcal
Score
27 / 100
Akçaağaç tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
418 vs 588(+40.7%)
Score Diff
29 vs 27(-6.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Akçaağaç tohumu
Higher energy
Kaju Ezmesi
Score leader
Akçaağaç tohumu
Nutrient split
8 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akçaağaç tohumu and Kaju Ezmesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akçaağaç tohumu has 418.0 kcal and Kaju Ezmesi has 588.0 kcal. The difference is 170.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 27. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akçaağaç tohumu | Kaju Ezmesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.35 mg | 0.4 mg | +14.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.2 mg | +11.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.42 mg | 0.3 mg | -28.6% |
| Bakir | 0.85 mg | 2.2 mg | +158.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.4 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 4.8 mg | 5 mg | +4.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 11.5 g | 2 g | -82.6% |
| Folat DFE | 62 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 390 mg | 490 mg | +25.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 145 mg | 43 mg | -70.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 38.6 g | 26.6 g | -31.1% |
| Kül | 3.7 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 180 mg | 258 mg | +43.3% |
| Mangan | 2.6 mg | 0.8 mg | -69.2% |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | 1.4 mg | -33.3% |
| Potasyum | 650 mg | 560 mg | -13.8% |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 17.5 g | -21.9% |
| Selenyum | — | 11.5 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 9 mg | 15 mg | +66.7% |
| Su | 18.5 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.1 g | 9.5 g | +352.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.5 g | 27.3 g | +320.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 16.8 g | 49.4 g | +194.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.2 g | 7.8 g | +8.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.2 g | 6.4 g | +52.4% |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 5.6 mg | +75.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akçaağaç tohumu and Kaju Ezmesi.
Akçaağaç tohumu has less energy per 100 g (418 kcal versus 588 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Akçaağaç tohumu has 2.1 g and Kaju Ezmesi has 9.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akçaağaç tohumu 29, Kaju Ezmesi 27.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.