Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
646 kcal
Score
18 / 100
Akçaağaç tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
418 vs 646(+54.5%)
Score Diff
29 vs 18(-37.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Akçaağaç tohumu
Higher energy
Giresun Fındığı
Score leader
Akçaağaç tohumu
Nutrient split
11 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akçaağaç tohumu and Giresun Fındığı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akçaağaç tohumu has 418.0 kcal and Giresun Fındığı has 646.0 kcal. The difference is 228.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 18. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akçaağaç tohumu | Giresun Fındığı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.35 mg | 0.64 mg | +82.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.11 mg | -38.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.42 mg | 0.56 mg | +33.3% |
| Bakir | 0.85 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.4 mg | 6.3 mg | +162.5% |
| Demir | 4.8 mg | 4.7 mg | -2.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 11.5 g | 9.7 g | -15.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 15 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 62 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 390 mg | 290 mg | -25.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 145 mg | 114 mg | -21.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 38.6 g | 16.7 g | -56.7% |
| Kül | 3.7 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 180 mg | 163 mg | -9.4% |
| Mangan | 2.6 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | 1.8 mg | -14.3% |
| Potasyum | 650 mg | 680 mg | +4.6% |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 15 g | -33.0% |
| Sodyum | 9 mg | — | — |
| Su | 18.5 g | 4.7 g | -74.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.1 g | 4.5 g | +114.3% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 113 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.5 g | 45.6 g | +601.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 16.8 g | 60.8 g | +261.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.2 g | 7.9 g | +9.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.2 g | 4.3 g | +2.4% |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 2.5 mg | -21.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akçaağaç tohumu and Giresun Fındığı.
Akçaağaç tohumu has less energy per 100 g (418 kcal versus 646 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Akçaağaç tohumu has 6.5 g and Giresun Fındığı has 45.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akçaağaç tohumu 29, Giresun Fındığı 18.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.