Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
654 kcal
Score
14 / 100
Akçaağaç tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
418 vs 654(+56.5%)
Score Diff
29 vs 14(-51.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Akçaağaç tohumu
Higher energy
Beyaz ceviz
Score leader
Akçaağaç tohumu
Nutrient split
13 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akçaağaç tohumu and Beyaz ceviz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akçaağaç tohumu has 418.0 kcal and Beyaz ceviz has 654.0 kcal. The difference is 236.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 14. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akçaağaç tohumu | Beyaz ceviz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | — | 9.08 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.35 mg | 0.346 mg | -1.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.42 mg | 0.537 mg | +27.9% |
| Bakir | 0.85 mg | 1.58 mg | +85.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.4 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 4.8 mg | 2.91 mg | -39.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 11.5 g | 6.7 g | -41.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.7 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 654 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 62 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 390 mg | 346 mg | -11.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 145 mg | 98 mg | -32.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 38.6 g | 13.71 g | -64.5% |
| Kül | 3.7 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 180 mg | 158 mg | -12.2% |
| Mangan | 2.6 mg | 3.41 mg | +31.2% |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 650 mg | 441 mg | -32.2% |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 15.23 g | -32.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 38.09 g | — |
| Selenyum | — | 4.9 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 9 mg | 2 mg | -77.8% |
| Su | 18.5 g | 4.07 g | -78.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.1 g | 6.13 g | +191.9% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 98 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.5 g | 8.93 g | +37.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 16.8 g | 65.21 g | +288.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.2 g | 47.17 g | +555.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.2 g | 2.61 g | -37.9% |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 3.09 mg | -3.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akçaağaç tohumu and Beyaz ceviz.
Akçaağaç tohumu has less energy per 100 g (418 kcal versus 654 kcal).
For measured Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri, Akçaağaç tohumu has 7.2 g and Beyaz ceviz has 47.17 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akçaağaç tohumu 29, Beyaz ceviz 14.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.