Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
380 kcal
Score
57 / 100
Ay çekirdeği proteini has a higher nutrition quality score (57) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
418 vs 380(-9.1%)
Score Diff
29 vs 57(+96.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ay çekirdeği proteini
Higher energy
Akçaağaç tohumu
Score leader
Ay çekirdeği proteini
Nutrient split
6 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akçaağaç tohumu and Ay çekirdeği proteini are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akçaağaç tohumu has 418.0 kcal and Ay çekirdeği proteini has 380.0 kcal. The difference is 38.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 57. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akçaağaç tohumu | Ay çekirdeği proteini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arjinin | — | 4.5 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.35 mg | 1.2 mg | +242.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.3 mg | +66.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.42 mg | 0.8 mg | +90.5% |
| Bakir | 0.85 mg | 1.8 mg | +111.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.4 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 4.8 mg | 8.5 mg | +77.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 11.5 g | 10 g | -13.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 5 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 62 µg | 220 µg | +254.8% |
| Fosfor | 390 mg | — | — |
| Glutamik asit | — | 11.5 g | — |
| Kalsiyum | 145 mg | 140 mg | -3.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 38.6 g | 15 g | -61.1% |
| Kül | 3.7 g | — | — |
| Lizin | — | 2.1 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 180 mg | 350 mg | +94.4% |
| Mangan | 2.6 mg | 2.5 mg | -3.8% |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 650 mg | 900 mg | +38.5% |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 55 g | +145.5% |
| Selenyum | — | 70 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 9 mg | 20 mg | +122.2% |
| Su | 18.5 g | 5 g | -73.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.5 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 16.8 g | 12 g | -28.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.2 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.2 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 7 mg | +118.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akçaağaç tohumu and Ay çekirdeği proteini.
Ay çekirdeği proteini has less energy per 100 g (380 kcal versus 418 kcal).
For measured Folat DFE, Akçaağaç tohumu has 62 µg and Ay çekirdeği proteini has 220 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akçaağaç tohumu 29, Ay çekirdeği proteini 57.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.