Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
375 kcal
Score
68 / 100
Tane Kimyon has a higher nutrition quality score (68) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
305 vs 375(+22.9%)
Score Diff
62 vs 68(+9.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tane Kimyon
Higher energy
Tane Kimyon
Score leader
Tane Kimyon
Nutrient split
5 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) and Tane Kimyon are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) has 305.0 kcal and Tane Kimyon has 375.0 kcal. The difference is 70.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 62 and 68. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) | Tane Kimyon | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 7 µg | 64 µg | +814.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.21 mg | 0.628 mg | +199.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.28 mg | 0.327 mg | +16.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.435 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.867 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 7.7 mg | — |
| Demir | 12.6 mg | 66.36 mg | +426.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 38.8 g | 10.5 g | -72.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 3.33 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 10 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 350 mg | 499 mg | +42.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 5.4 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1525 mg | 931 mg | -39.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 43 g | 44.24 g | +2.9% |
| Kül | 7.8 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 240 mg | 366 mg | +52.5% |
| Mangan | — | 3.333 mg | — |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | 4.579 mg | +118.0% |
| Potasyum | 1390 mg | 1788 mg | +28.6% |
| Protein | 16 g | 17.81 g | +11.3% |
| Sodyum | 10 mg | 168 mg | +1580.0% |
| Su | 7.4 g | 8.06 g | +8.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.6 g | 1.535 g | -4.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 13.8 g | 14.04 g | +1.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 25 g | 22.27 g | -10.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 8.2 g | 3.279 g | -60.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.25 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.3 mg | 4.8 mg | +45.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) and Tane Kimyon.
Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) has less energy per 100 g (305 kcal versus 375 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) has 10 mg and Tane Kimyon has 168 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) 62, Tane Kimyon 68.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.