Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
19 kcal
Score
21 / 100
Şampanya Sirkesi has a higher nutrition quality score (21) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
263 vs 19(-92.8%)
Score Diff
6 vs 21(+250.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Şampanya Sirkesi
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Şampanya Sirkesi
Nutrient split
15 - 1 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu reçeli and Şampanya Sirkesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal and Şampanya Sirkesi has 19.0 kcal. The difference is 244.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 21. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu reçeli | Şampanya Sirkesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | 0.015 mg | -62.5% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 0.25 mg | -37.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Enerji | — | 79.5 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 263 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 5 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 9 mg | 8 mg | -11.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 7 mg | -53.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68 g | 0.9 g | -98.7% |
| Kül | 0.3 g | 0.2 g | -33.3% |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 4 mg | -33.3% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | 0.045 mg | -70.0% |
| Potasyum | 77 mg | 39 mg | -49.4% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.04 g | -90.0% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 4 mg | -66.7% |
| Su | 30.2 g | 94.8 g | +213.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 60.3 g | 0.4 g | -99.3% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.05 mg | -37.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu reçeli and Şampanya Sirkesi.
Şampanya Sirkesi has less energy per 100 g (19 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured Su, Ahududu reçeli has 30.2 g and Şampanya Sirkesi has 94.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu reçeli 6, Şampanya Sirkesi 21.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.