Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
278 kcal
Score
22 / 100
Elma Pekmezi has a higher nutrition quality score (22) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
263 vs 278(+5.7%)
Score Diff
6 vs 22(+266.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Elma Pekmezi
Higher energy
Elma Pekmezi
Score leader
Elma Pekmezi
Nutrient split
3 - 12 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu reçeli and Elma Pekmezi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal and Elma Pekmezi has 278.0 kcal. The difference is 15.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 22. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu reçeli | Elma Pekmezi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.07 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.14 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | 0.28 mg | +600.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | 1.8 mg | -77.5% |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 3.8 mg | +850.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 0.3 g | -72.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 263 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 5 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 9 mg | 48 mg | +433.3% |
| Fruktoz | — | 34.8 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 23.1 g | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 115 mg | +666.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68 g | 68.5 g | +0.7% |
| Kül | 0.3 g | 2 g | +566.7% |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 42 mg | +600.0% |
| Malik asit | — | 1250 mg | — |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.65 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 77 mg | 840 mg | +990.9% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.9 g | +125.0% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 4.6 g | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 24 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 30.2 g | 28.2 g | -6.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.1 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 60.3 g | 62.5 g | +3.6% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.75 mg | +837.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu reçeli and Elma Pekmezi.
Ahududu reçeli has less energy per 100 g (263 kcal versus 278 kcal).
For measured Potasyum, Ahududu reçeli has 77 mg and Elma Pekmezi has 840 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu reçeli 6, Elma Pekmezi 22.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.