Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (52) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
52.6 vs 73(+38.8%)
Score Diff
52 vs 15(-71.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Mangostan
Score leader
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
15 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Mangostan are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 52.6 kcal and Mangostan has 73.0 kcal. The difference is 20.4 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 52 and 15. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Mangostan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.032 mg | 0.054 mg | +68.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.038 mg | 0.054 mg | +42.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.055 mg | 0.018 mg | -67.3% |
| Bakir | 0.09 mg | 0.069 mg | -23.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 26.2 mg | 2.9 mg | -88.9% |
| Demir | 0.69 mg | 0.3 mg | -56.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.5 g | 1.8 g | -72.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.87 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | — | 305 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 73 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 21 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 29 mg | 8 mg | -72.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 7.8 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 12 mg | -52.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 11.94 g | 17.91 g | +50.0% |
| Kül | — | 0.36 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 136 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 13 mg | -40.9% |
| Mangan | 0.67 mg | 0.102 mg | -84.8% |
| Niasin | 0.598 mg | 0.286 mg | -52.2% |
| Potasyum | 151 mg | 48 mg | -68.2% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.41 g | -65.8% |
| Sodyum | — | 7 mg | — |
| Su | 85.75 g | 80.94 g | -5.6% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 31 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.65 g | 0.58 g | -10.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.42 g | 15.6 g | +252.9% |
| Çinko | 0.42 mg | 0.21 mg | -50.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Mangostan.
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has less energy per 100 g (52.6 kcal versus 73 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 4.42 g and Mangostan has 15.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) 52, Mangostan 15.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.