Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (52) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
52.6 vs 58(+10.3%)
Score Diff
52 vs 46(-11.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Kızılcık
Score leader
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
14 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Kızılcık are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 52.6 kcal and Kızılcık has 58.0 kcal. The difference is 5.4 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 52 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Kızılcık | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 18 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.032 mg | 0.03 mg | -6.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.038 mg | 0.04 mg | +5.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.055 mg | 0.07 mg | +27.3% |
| Bakir | 0.09 mg | 0.08 mg | -11.1% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 210 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 26.2 mg | 54 mg | +106.1% |
| Demir | 0.69 mg | 0.7 mg | +1.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.5 g | 2.8 g | -56.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.87 mg | 0.8 mg | -8.0% |
| Folat DFE | 21 µg | 12 µg | -42.9% |
| Fosfor | 29 mg | 26 mg | -10.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 7.8 µg | 4.5 µg | -42.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 38 mg | +52.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 11.94 g | 13.5 g | +13.1% |
| Kül | — | 0.6 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 136 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 14 mg | -36.4% |
| Mangan | 0.67 mg | 0.25 mg | -62.7% |
| Niasin | 0.598 mg | 0.35 mg | -41.5% |
| Potasyum | 151 mg | 280 mg | +85.4% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.8 g | -33.3% |
| Sodyum | — | 3 mg | — |
| Su | 85.75 g | 84.5 g | -1.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.65 g | 0.2 g | -69.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.42 g | 9.2 g | +108.1% |
| Çinko | 0.42 mg | 0.15 mg | -64.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Kızılcık.
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has less energy per 100 g (52.6 kcal versus 58 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 4.42 g and Kızılcık has 9.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) 52, Kızılcık 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.