Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
185 kcal
Score
52 / 100
Ahtapot (Izgara) has a higher nutrition quality score (84) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
164 vs 185(+12.8%)
Score Diff
84 vs 52(-38.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahtapot (Izgara)
Higher energy
Kaz yumurtası
Score leader
Ahtapot (Izgara)
Nutrient split
15 - 7 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahtapot (Izgara) and Kaz yumurtası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahtapot (Izgara) has 164.0 kcal and Kaz yumurtası has 185.0 kcal. The difference is 21.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 84 and 52. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
23 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahtapot (Izgara) | Kaz yumurtası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 90 µg | 185 µg | +105.6% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 36 µg | 5.1 µg | -85.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.38 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.65 mg | 0.24 mg | -63.1% |
| Bakir | 0.74 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 1.7 µg | — |
| Demir | 9.54 mg | 3.64 mg | -61.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.1 mg | 1.29 mg | -38.6% |
| Fosfor | 279 mg | 208 mg | -25.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 106 mg | 73 mg | -31.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.4 g | 1.35 g | -69.3% |
| Kolesterol | 96 mg | 852 mg | +787.5% |
| Kül | 3.2 g | 1.08 g | -66.3% |
| Magnezyum | 60 mg | 22 mg | -63.3% |
| Niasin | 3.78 mg | 0.24 mg | -93.7% |
| Potasyum | 630 mg | 210 mg | -66.7% |
| Protein | 29.82 g | 13.87 g | -53.5% |
| Selenyum | 89.6 µg | 36.9 µg | -58.8% |
| Sodyum | 460 mg | 138 mg | -70.0% |
| Su | 60.5 g | 70.43 g | +16.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | 3.68 g | +717.8% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 60 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 263.4 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.32 g | 5.7 g | +1681.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 2.08 g | 13.27 g | +538.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.51 g | 1.72 g | +237.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.94 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.36 mg | 1.33 mg | -60.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahtapot (Izgara) and Kaz yumurtası.
Ahtapot (Izgara) has less energy per 100 g (164 kcal versus 185 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Ahtapot (Izgara) has 0.32 g and Kaz yumurtası has 5.7 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahtapot (Izgara) 84, Kaz yumurtası 52.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.