Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
86 kcal
Score
88 / 100
Kara Midye has a higher nutrition quality score (88) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
164 vs 86(-47.6%)
Score Diff
84 vs 88(+4.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kara Midye
Higher energy
Ahtapot (Izgara)
Score leader
Kara Midye
Nutrient split
17 - 4 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahtapot (Izgara) and Kara Midye are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahtapot (Izgara) has 164.0 kcal and Kara Midye has 86.0 kcal. The difference is 78.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 84 and 88. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
23 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahtapot (Izgara) | Kara Midye | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 90 µg | 48 µg | -46.7% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.16 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 36 µg | 12 µg | -66.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.21 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.65 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.74 mg | 0.094 mg | -87.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | 8 mg | 0.0% |
| Demir | 9.54 mg | 3.95 mg | -58.6% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.28 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.1 mg | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.32 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 42 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 279 mg | 197 mg | -29.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 106 mg | 26 mg | -75.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.4 g | 3.69 g | -16.1% |
| Kolesterol | 96 mg | 28 mg | -70.8% |
| Kül | 3.2 g | 1.59 g | -50.3% |
| Magnezyum | 60 mg | 34 mg | -43.3% |
| Mangan | — | 3.4 mg | — |
| Niasin | 3.78 mg | 1.6 mg | -57.7% |
| Potasyum | 630 mg | 320 mg | -49.2% |
| Protein | 29.82 g | 11.9 g | -60.1% |
| Selenyum | 89.6 µg | 44.8 µg | -50.0% |
| Sodyum | 460 mg | 286 mg | -37.8% |
| Su | 60.5 g | 80.58 g | +33.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | 0.43 g | -4.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.32 g | 0.51 g | +59.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 2.08 g | 2.24 g | +7.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.51 g | 0.77 g | +51.0% |
| Çinko | 3.36 mg | 1.6 mg | -52.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahtapot (Izgara) and Kara Midye.
Kara Midye has less energy per 100 g (86 kcal versus 164 kcal).
For measured Bakir, Ahtapot (Izgara) has 0.74 mg and Kara Midye has 0.094 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahtapot (Izgara) 84, Kara Midye 88.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.