Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
58 kcal
Score
46 / 100
Kızılcık has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
68 vs 58(-14.7%)
Score Diff
28 vs 46(+64.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kızılcık
Higher energy
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu)
Score leader
Kızılcık
Nutrient split
5 - 11 (tie: 5)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) and Kızılcık are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has 68.0 kcal and Kızılcık has 58.0 kcal. The difference is 10.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 28 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) | Kızılcık | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 18 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.03 mg | 0.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.04 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.05 mg | 0.07 mg | +40.0% |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | 0.08 mg | 0.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 35 µg | 210 µg | +500.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 7.5 mg | 54 mg | +620.0% |
| Demir | 0.5 mg | 0.7 mg | +40.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.2 g | 2.8 g | -54.8% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.8 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 12 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 16 mg | 26 mg | +62.5% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 4.5 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 38 mg | +72.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 17.5 g | 13.5 g | -22.9% |
| Kül | 0.6 g | 0.6 g | 0.0% |
| Magnezyum | 11 mg | 14 mg | +27.3% |
| Mangan | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.35 mg | 0.35 mg | 0.0% |
| Potasyum | 145 mg | 280 mg | +93.1% |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.8 g | +33.3% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 3 mg | +50.0% |
| Su | 79.5 g | 84.5 g | +6.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.04 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 8 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.2 g | -33.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.8 g | 9.2 g | -6.1% |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.15 mg | -25.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) and Kızılcık.
Kızılcık has less energy per 100 g (58 kcal versus 68 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has 7.5 mg and Kızılcık has 54 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) 28, Kızılcık 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.