Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
103 kcal
Score
40 / 100
Ekmek ağacı meyvesi has a higher nutrition quality score (40) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
68 vs 103(+51.5%)
Score Diff
28 vs 40(+42.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ekmek ağacı meyvesi
Higher energy
Ekmek ağacı meyvesi
Score leader
Ekmek ağacı meyvesi
Nutrient split
6 - 11 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) and Ekmek ağacı meyvesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has 68.0 kcal and Ekmek ağacı meyvesi has 103.0 kcal. The difference is 35.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 28 and 40. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) | Ekmek ağacı meyvesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.03 mg | -25.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.05 mg | 0.1 mg | +100.0% |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | 0.08 mg | 0.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 35 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 7.5 mg | 29 mg | +286.7% |
| Demir | 0.5 mg | 0.54 mg | +8.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.2 g | 4.9 g | -21.0% |
| Fosfor | 16 mg | 30 mg | +87.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 17 mg | -22.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 17.5 g | 27.12 g | +55.0% |
| Kül | 0.6 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 22 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 11 mg | 25 mg | +127.3% |
| Mangan | — | 0.06 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.35 mg | 0.9 mg | +157.1% |
| Potasyum | 145 mg | 490 mg | +237.9% |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 1.07 g | +78.3% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 2 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 79.5 g | 70.65 g | -11.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.04 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 8 µg | 14 µg | +75.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.23 g | -23.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.8 g | 11 g | +12.2% |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.12 mg | -40.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) and Ekmek ağacı meyvesi.
Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has less energy per 100 g (68 kcal versus 103 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) has 7.5 mg and Ekmek ağacı meyvesi has 29 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahlat (Yaban Armudu) 28, Ekmek ağacı meyvesi 40.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.