Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
168 kcal
Score
37 / 100
Sumak Ekşisi has a higher nutrition quality score (37) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
310 vs 168(-45.8%)
Score Diff
0 vs 37(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sumak Ekşisi
Higher energy
Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave)
Score leader
Sumak Ekşisi
Nutrient split
3 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave) and Sumak Ekşisi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave) has 310.0 kcal and Sumak Ekşisi has 168.0 kcal. The difference is 142.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 37. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave) | Sumak Ekşisi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.014 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.02 mg | 0.32 mg | +1500.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 18.5 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.11 mg | 2.6 mg | +2263.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.2 g | 2.1 g | +950.0% |
| Enerji | 1297 kj | — | — |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | 46 mg | +4500.0% |
| Fruktoz | 55.6 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 12.4 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1 mg | 94 mg | +9300.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 76.37 g | 42.2 g | -44.7% |
| Kül | 0.09 g | 2.4 g | +2566.7% |
| Magnezyum | 1 mg | 38 mg | +3700.0% |
| Malik asit | — | 1450 mg | — |
| Mangan | 0.03 mg | 0.78 mg | +2500.0% |
| Niasin | — | 0.92 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 4 mg | 480 mg | +11900.0% |
| Protein | 0.09 g | 1.4 g | +1455.6% |
| Sakkaroz | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 0.6 µg | — | — |
| Sitrik asit | — | 620 mg | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 35 mg | +775.0% |
| Su | 23 g | 51.5 g | +123.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.45 g | 0.4 g | -11.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 68.1 g | 24.8 g | -63.6% |
| Çinko | 0.05 mg | 0.55 mg | +1000.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave) and Sumak Ekşisi.
Sumak Ekşisi has less energy per 100 g (168 kcal versus 310 kcal).
For measured Potasyum, Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave) has 4 mg and Sumak Ekşisi has 480 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Agave Şurubu (Mavi Agave) 0, Sumak Ekşisi 37.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.