Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
647 kcal
Score
39 / 100
Kakao kitlesi has a higher nutrition quality score (39) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
310 vs 647(+108.7%)
Score Diff
1 vs 39(+3800.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kakao kitlesi
Higher energy
Kakao kitlesi
Score leader
Kakao kitlesi
Nutrient split
3 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Agave nektarı and Kakao kitlesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Agave nektarı has 310.0 kcal and Kakao kitlesi has 647.0 kcal. The difference is 337.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 1 and 39. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Agave nektarı | Kakao kitlesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.015 mg | 0.24 mg | +1500.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.014 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.033 mg | 3.8 mg | +11415.2% |
| Demir | 0.11 mg | 17.4 mg | +15718.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.2 g | 16.6 g | +8200.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.59 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 2707 kj | — |
| Folat DFE | 1 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | 430 mg | +42900.0% |
| Fruktoz | 55.6 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 12.43 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 4.1 µg | — |
| Kafein | — | 186 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1 mg | 73 mg | +7200.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 76.37 g | 27.7 g | -63.7% |
| Kül | 0.14 g | 2.4 g | +1614.3% |
| Magnezyum | 1 mg | 327 mg | +32600.0% |
| Mangan | 0.041 mg | 1.9 mg | +4534.1% |
| Niasin | — | 2.2 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 4 mg | 830 mg | +20650.0% |
| Protein | 0.09 g | 12.9 g | +14233.3% |
| Selenyum | 0.7 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 24 mg | +500.0% |
| Su | 22.95 g | 1.5 g | -93.5% |
| Teobromin | — | 1580 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 32.3 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 52 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 17.8 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.45 g | 52.6 g | +11588.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.7 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 68.03 g | 0.3 g | -99.6% |
| Çinko | 0.09 mg | 4.6 mg | +5011.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Agave nektarı and Kakao kitlesi.
Agave nektarı has less energy per 100 g (310 kcal versus 647 kcal).
For measured Fosfor, Agave nektarı has 1 mg and Kakao kitlesi has 430 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Agave nektarı 1, Kakao kitlesi 39.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.