Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
245 kcal
Score
36 / 100
Kadınbudu Köfte has a higher nutrition quality score (36) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
409.4 vs 245(-40.2%)
Score Diff
35 vs 36(+2.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kadınbudu Köfte
Higher energy
Afyon Sucuğu
Score leader
Kadınbudu Köfte
Nutrient split
18 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Afyon Sucuğu and Kadınbudu Köfte are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Afyon Sucuğu has 409.4 kcal and Kadınbudu Köfte has 245.0 kcal. The difference is 164.4 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 35 and 36. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Afyon Sucuğu | Kadınbudu Köfte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 45 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.23 mg | 0.08 mg | -65.2% |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.2 µg | 1.1 µg | -50.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | 0.15 mg | -40.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.36 mg | 0.18 mg | -50.0% |
| Demir | 2.7 mg | 1.8 mg | -33.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.7 g | 0.6 g | -14.3% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 245 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 195 mg | 145 mg | -25.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 26 mg | 24 mg | -7.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 2.4 g | 11.5 g | +379.2% |
| Kolesterol | 88 mg | 82 mg | -6.8% |
| Kül | 4.7 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 19 mg | 18 mg | -5.3% |
| Niasin | 4.3 mg | 3.2 mg | -25.6% |
| Potasyum | 325 mg | 220 mg | -32.3% |
| Protein | 18.5 g | 14.2 g | -23.2% |
| Sodyum | 1480 mg | 410 mg | -72.3% |
| Su | 37.5 g | 56.2 g | +49.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 16.8 g | 4.8 g | -71.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 15.1 g | 6.2 g | -58.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 36.2 g | 15.8 g | -56.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.9 g | 3.5 g | +84.2% |
| Çinko | 3.9 mg | 2.4 mg | -38.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Afyon Sucuğu and Kadınbudu Köfte.
Kadınbudu Köfte has less energy per 100 g (245 kcal versus 409.4 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Afyon Sucuğu has 2.4 g and Kadınbudu Köfte has 11.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Afyon Sucuğu 35, Kadınbudu Köfte 36.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.