Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
168.4 kcal
Score
10 / 100
Afyon Sucuğu has a higher nutrition quality score (35) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
409.4 vs 168.4(-58.9%)
Score Diff
35 vs 10(-71.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Afyon Sucuğu
Higher energy
Afyon Sucuğu
Score leader
Afyon Sucuğu
Nutrient split
15 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Afyon Sucuğu and Kaçamak are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Afyon Sucuğu has 409.4 kcal and Kaçamak has 168.4 kcal. The difference is 241.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 35 and 10. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Afyon Sucuğu | Kaçamak | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 22 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.23 mg | 0.09 mg | -60.9% |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.2 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | 0.05 mg | -80.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.36 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 2.7 mg | 0.78 mg | -71.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.7 g | 2.3 g | +228.6% |
| Fosfor | 195 mg | 62 mg | -68.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 26 mg | 14 mg | -46.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 2.4 g | 28.6 g | +1091.7% |
| Kolesterol | 88 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 4.7 g | 1.33 g | -71.7% |
| Magnezyum | 19 mg | 26 mg | +36.8% |
| Mangan | — | 0.16 mg | — |
| Niasin | 4.3 mg | 0.88 mg | -79.5% |
| Potasyum | 325 mg | 88 mg | -72.9% |
| Protein | 18.5 g | 2.85 g | -84.6% |
| Sodyum | 1480 mg | 215 mg | -85.5% |
| Su | 37.5 g | 61.8 g | +64.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 16.8 g | 2.15 g | -87.2% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 14 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 15.1 g | 1.78 g | -88.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 36.2 g | 5.42 g | -85.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.9 g | 1.15 g | -39.5% |
| Çinko | 3.9 mg | 0.42 mg | -89.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Afyon Sucuğu and Kaçamak.
Kaçamak has less energy per 100 g (168.4 kcal versus 409.4 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Afyon Sucuğu has 2.4 g and Kaçamak has 28.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Afyon Sucuğu 35, Kaçamak 10.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.