Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
42 kcal
Score
90 / 100
Isırgan Otu has a higher nutrition quality score (90) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
28 vs 42(+50.0%)
Score Diff
71 vs 90(+26.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Isırgan Otu
Higher energy
Isırgan Otu
Score leader
Isırgan Otu
Nutrient split
5 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Afrika patlıcanı and Isırgan Otu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Afrika patlıcanı has 28.0 kcal and Isırgan Otu has 42.0 kcal. The difference is 14.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 90. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Afrika patlıcanı | Isırgan Otu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 5 µg | 101 µg | +1920.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.008 mg | -84.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.16 mg | +300.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.08 mg | 0.103 mg | +28.7% |
| Beta Karoten | 60 µg | 1150 µg | +1816.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 5 mg | 27.2 mg | +444.0% |
| Demir | 0.6 mg | 1.64 mg | +173.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.5 g | 6.9 g | +176.0% |
| Enerji | 117 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 42 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 22 µg | 14 µg | -36.4% |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 71 mg | +195.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 498 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 481 mg | +2572.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.9 g | 7.49 g | +26.9% |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 57 mg | +256.3% |
| Niasin | 0.6 mg | 0.38 mg | -36.7% |
| Potasyum | 230 mg | 334 mg | +45.2% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 2.71 g | +125.8% |
| Sodyum | 3 mg | 4 mg | +33.3% |
| Su | 91.2 g | 87.6 g | -3.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.11 g | -45.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.8 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.17 mg | 0.43 mg | +152.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Afrika patlıcanı and Isırgan Otu.
Afrika patlıcanı has less energy per 100 g (28 kcal versus 42 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Afrika patlıcanı has 18 mg and Isırgan Otu has 481 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Afrika patlıcanı 71, Isırgan Otu 90.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.