Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
336 kcal
Score
46 / 100
Kuru Börülce has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
329 vs 336(+2.1%)
Score Diff
41 vs 46(+12.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru Börülce
Higher energy
Kuru Börülce
Score leader
Kuru Börülce
Nutrient split
10 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adzuki fasulyesi and Kuru Börülce are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adzuki fasulyesi has 329.0 kcal and Kuru Börülce has 336.0 kcal. The difference is 7.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 41 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adzuki fasulyesi | Kuru Börülce | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.455 mg | 0.85 mg | +86.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.22 mg | 0.18 mg | -18.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.351 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 1.09 mg | 0.85 mg | -22.0% |
| Demir | 4.98 mg | 8.27 mg | +66.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.7 g | 10.6 g | -16.5% |
| Enerji | — | 1407 kj | — |
| Fosfor | 381 mg | 424 mg | +11.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 66 mg | 110 mg | +66.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 62.96 g | 60.03 g | -4.7% |
| Kül | 3.82 g | 3.24 g | -15.2% |
| Magnezyum | 127 mg | 184 mg | +44.9% |
| Mangan | 1.73 mg | 1.53 mg | -11.6% |
| Niasin | 2.63 mg | 2.08 mg | -20.9% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.47 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 1254 mg | 1112 mg | -11.3% |
| Protein | 19.87 g | 23.52 g | +18.4% |
| Selenyum | 3.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 16 mg | +220.0% |
| Su | 16.32 g | 11.95 g | -26.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 622 µg | 633 µg | +1.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.53 g | 1.26 g | +137.7% |
| Çinko | 5.04 mg | 3.37 mg | -33.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adzuki fasulyesi and Kuru Börülce.
Adzuki fasulyesi has less energy per 100 g (329 kcal versus 336 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Adzuki fasulyesi has 5 mg and Kuru Börülce has 16 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adzuki fasulyesi 41, Kuru Börülce 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.