Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Adzuki fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
329 vs 143(-56.5%)
Score Diff
41 vs 32(-22.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adzuki fasulyesi
Higher energy
Adzuki fasulyesi
Score leader
Adzuki fasulyesi
Nutrient split
18 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adzuki fasulyesi and Borlotti Fasulyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adzuki fasulyesi has 329.0 kcal and Borlotti Fasulyesi has 143.0 kcal. The difference is 186.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 41 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adzuki fasulyesi | Borlotti Fasulyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.455 mg | 0.16 mg | -64.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.22 mg | 0.06 mg | -72.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.351 mg | 0.14 mg | -60.1% |
| Bakir | 1.09 mg | 0.24 mg | -78.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 0.9 mg | — |
| Demir | 4.98 mg | 2.1 mg | -57.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.7 g | 6.4 g | -49.6% |
| Fosfor | 381 mg | 148 mg | -61.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 66 mg | 45 mg | -31.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 62.96 g | 25.1 g | -60.1% |
| Kül | 3.82 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 127 mg | 54 mg | -57.5% |
| Mangan | 1.73 mg | 0.48 mg | -72.3% |
| Niasin | 2.63 mg | 0.46 mg | -82.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.47 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 1254 mg | 395 mg | -68.5% |
| Protein | 19.87 g | 9.3 g | -53.2% |
| Selenyum | 3.2 µg | 1.2 µg | -62.5% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 2 mg | -60.0% |
| Su | 16.32 g | 62.8 g | +284.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.12 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 622 µg | 172 µg | -72.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.08 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.53 g | 0.65 g | +22.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.31 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.32 g | — |
| Çinko | 5.04 mg | 1.05 mg | -79.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adzuki fasulyesi and Borlotti Fasulyesi.
Borlotti Fasulyesi has less energy per 100 g (143 kcal versus 329 kcal).
For measured Su, Adzuki fasulyesi has 16.32 g and Borlotti Fasulyesi has 62.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adzuki fasulyesi 41, Borlotti Fasulyesi 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.