Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
168.4 kcal
Score
10 / 100
Adana kebabı has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
268.8 vs 168.4(-37.4%)
Score Diff
42 vs 10(-76.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adana kebabı
Higher energy
Adana kebabı
Score leader
Adana kebabı
Nutrient split
13 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adana kebabı and Kaçamak are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adana kebabı has 268.8 kcal and Kaçamak has 168.4 kcal. The difference is 100.4 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 42 and 10. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adana kebabı | Kaçamak | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | 22 µg | -21.4% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.09 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.1 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.32 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.2 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.9 mg | 0.78 mg | -58.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.4 g | 2.3 g | +475.0% |
| Fosfor | 165 mg | 62 mg | -62.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 14 mg | -12.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 1.2 g | 28.6 g | +2283.3% |
| Kolesterol | 75 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.9 g | 1.33 g | -30.0% |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 26 mg | +44.4% |
| Mangan | — | 0.16 mg | — |
| Niasin | 4.8 mg | 0.88 mg | -81.7% |
| Potasyum | 265 mg | 88 mg | -66.8% |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 2.85 g | -82.7% |
| Sodyum | 460 mg | 215 mg | -53.3% |
| Su | 55.4 g | 61.8 g | +11.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 10.2 g | 2.15 g | -78.9% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 14 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.1 g | 1.78 g | -80.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 22 g | 5.42 g | -75.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 1.15 g | +4.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.6 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.6 mg | 0.42 mg | -88.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adana kebabı and Kaçamak.
Kaçamak has less energy per 100 g (168.4 kcal versus 268.8 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Adana kebabı has 1.2 g and Kaçamak has 28.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adana kebabı 42, Kaçamak 10.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.