Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
0 kcal
Score
— / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
1 vs 0
Score Diff
100 vs —
Higher energy
Adaçayı (Tıbbi)
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
6 - 5 (tie: 3)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) and Maden Suyu (Magnezyum Deposu) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has 1.0 kcal and Maden Suyu (Magnezyum Deposu) has 0.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adaçayı (Tıbbi) | Maden Suyu (Magnezyum Deposu) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.004 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.008 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.01 mg | 0.002 mg | -80.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.2 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.08 mg | 0.01 mg | -87.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 1 kcal | — | — |
| Florür | — | 75 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | — | — |
| İyot | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Kafein | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 3 mg | 20.4 mg | +580.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kül | 0.1 g | 0.3 g | +200.0% |
| Magnezyum | 2 mg | 32.5 mg | +1525.0% |
| Mangan | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 14 mg | 2.6 mg | -81.4% |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 13.8 mg | +1280.0% |
| Su | 99.6 g | 99.7 g | +0.1% |
| Sulfur, S | — | 5.4 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.03 mg | 0.01 mg | -66.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adaçayı (Tıbbi) and Maden Suyu (Magnezyum Deposu).
Maden Suyu (Magnezyum Deposu) has less energy per 100 g (0 kcal versus 1 kcal).
For measured Magnezyum, Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has 2 mg and Maden Suyu (Magnezyum Deposu) has 32.5 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adaçayı (Tıbbi) 100, Maden Suyu (Magnezyum Deposu) —.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) · Maden Suyu (Magnezyum Deposu) · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.