Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
43.5 kcal
Score
11 / 100
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
1 vs 43.5(+4250.0%)
Score Diff
100 vs 11(-89.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adaçayı (Tıbbi)
Higher energy
Gül Şerbeti (Isparta)
Score leader
Adaçayı (Tıbbi)
Nutrient split
3 - 12 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) and Gül Şerbeti (Isparta) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has 1.0 kcal and Gül Şerbeti (Isparta) has 43.5 kcal. The difference is 42.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 100 and 11. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adaçayı (Tıbbi) | Gül Şerbeti (Isparta) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.004 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.008 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.01 mg | 0.012 mg | +20.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.2 mg | 2.6 mg | +1200.0% |
| Demir | 0.08 mg | 0.11 mg | +37.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0.04 g | — |
| Enerji | — | 182 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 1 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | 2.4 mg | +140.0% |
| Fruktoz | — | 0.35 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 0.35 g | — |
| Kafein | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 3 mg | 4.2 mg | +40.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.2 g | 10.75 g | +5275.0% |
| Kül | 0.1 g | 0.08 g | -20.0% |
| Magnezyum | 2 mg | 2.1 mg | +5.0% |
| Mangan | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.035 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 14 mg | 19.5 mg | +39.3% |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.05 g | -50.0% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 9.8 g | — |
| Sitrik asit | — | 145 mg | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 3.2 mg | +220.0% |
| Su | 99.6 g | 89.1 g | -10.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0.02 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | 10.5 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.03 mg | 0.03 mg | 0.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adaçayı (Tıbbi) and Gül Şerbeti (Isparta).
Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 43.5 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Adaçayı (Tıbbi) has 0.2 g and Gül Şerbeti (Isparta) has 10.75 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adaçayı (Tıbbi) 100, Gül Şerbeti (Isparta) 11.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.