Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
265 kcal
Score
83 / 100
Meksika kekik has a higher nutrition quality score (83) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
315 vs 265(-15.9%)
Score Diff
76 vs 83(+9.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Meksika kekik
Higher energy
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Score leader
Meksika kekik
Nutrient split
9 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adaçayı (Kuru) and Meksika kekik are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 315.0 kcal and Meksika kekik has 265.0 kcal. The difference is 50.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 76 and 83. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adaçayı (Kuru) | Meksika kekik | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 295 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.75 mg | 0.17 mg | -77.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.34 mg | 0.53 mg | +55.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.69 mg | 1.04 mg | -61.3% |
| Bakir | — | 0.6 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 31.4 mg | 50 mg | +59.2% |
| Demir | 28.12 mg | 36.8 mg | +30.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 40.3 g | 42.8 g | +6.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 7.48 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 274 µg | 237 µg | -13.5% |
| Fosfor | 91 mg | 148 mg | +62.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1714 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1652 mg | 1597 mg | -3.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.73 g | 68.9 g | +13.5% |
| Kül | 7.93 g | 8 g | +0.9% |
| Magnezyum | 428 mg | 270 mg | -36.9% |
| Mangan | 3.13 mg | 5 mg | +59.7% |
| Niasin | 5.72 mg | 4.6 mg | -19.6% |
| Potasyum | 1070 mg | 1260 mg | +17.8% |
| Protein | 10.63 g | 9 g | -15.3% |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 25 mg | +127.3% |
| Su | 7.96 g | 9.9 g | +24.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.01 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.87 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.75 g | 4.3 g | -66.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.76 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.71 g | 4.1 g | +139.8% |
| Çinko | 4.7 mg | 2.7 mg | -42.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adaçayı (Kuru) and Meksika kekik.
Meksika kekik has less energy per 100 g (265 kcal versus 315 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 1.71 g and Meksika kekik has 4.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adaçayı (Kuru) 76, Meksika kekik 83.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.