Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
340 kcal
Score
8 / 100
Adaçayı (Kuru) has a higher nutrition quality score (76) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
315 vs 340(+7.9%)
Score Diff
76 vs 8(-89.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Higher energy
Mastika
Score leader
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Nutrient split
15 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adaçayı (Kuru) and Mastika are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 315.0 kcal and Mastika has 340.0 kcal. The difference is 25.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 76 and 8. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adaçayı (Kuru) | Mastika | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 295 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.75 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.34 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.69 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.12 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 31.4 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 28.12 mg | 1.8 mg | -93.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 40.3 g | 78 g | +93.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 7.48 mg | 0.6 mg | -92.0% |
| Folat DFE | 274 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 91 mg | 18 mg | -80.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1714 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1652 mg | 95 mg | -94.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.73 g | 82 g | +35.0% |
| Kül | 7.93 g | 0.5 g | -93.7% |
| Magnezyum | 428 mg | 25 mg | -94.2% |
| Mangan | 3.13 mg | 0.25 mg | -92.0% |
| Niasin | 5.72 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 1070 mg | 110 mg | -89.7% |
| Protein | 10.63 g | 0.15 g | -98.6% |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 12 mg | +9.1% |
| Su | 7.96 g | 1.5 g | -81.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.01 g | 0.2 g | -97.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.87 g | 0.4 g | -78.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.75 g | 1.2 g | -90.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.76 g | 0.3 g | -83.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.71 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 4.7 mg | 0.8 mg | -83.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adaçayı (Kuru) and Mastika.
Adaçayı (Kuru) has less energy per 100 g (315 kcal versus 340 kcal).
For measured Protein, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 10.63 g and Mastika has 0.15 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adaçayı (Kuru) 76, Mastika 8.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.