Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
275 kcal
Score
79 / 100
Mantar tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (79) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
315 vs 275(-12.7%)
Score Diff
76 vs 79(+3.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Mantar tozu
Higher energy
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Score leader
Mantar tozu
Nutrient split
8 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adaçayı (Kuru) and Mantar tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 315.0 kcal and Mantar tozu has 275.0 kcal. The difference is 40.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 76 and 79. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adaçayı (Kuru) | Mantar tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 295 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.75 mg | 0.65 mg | -13.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.34 mg | 3.2 mg | +841.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.69 mg | 0.85 mg | -68.4% |
| Bakir | — | 3.5 mg | — |
| Beta-glukan | — | 8.5 g | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 31.4 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 2.1 µg | — |
| Demir | 28.12 mg | 14.5 mg | -48.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 40.3 g | 22 g | -45.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 7.48 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 275 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 274 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 91 mg | 850 mg | +834.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1714 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1652 mg | 120 mg | -92.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.73 g | 48 g | -21.0% |
| Kül | 7.93 g | 9.8 g | +23.6% |
| Magnezyum | 428 mg | 110 mg | -74.3% |
| Mangan | 3.13 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 5.72 mg | 38.5 mg | +573.1% |
| Potasyum | 1070 mg | 3100 mg | +189.7% |
| Protein | 10.63 g | 28.5 g | +168.1% |
| Selenyum | — | 78 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 45 mg | +309.1% |
| Su | 7.96 g | 9.5 g | +19.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.01 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.87 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.75 g | 2.2 g | -82.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.76 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.71 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 4.7 mg | 7.2 mg | +53.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adaçayı (Kuru) and Mantar tozu.
Mantar tozu has less energy per 100 g (275 kcal versus 315 kcal).
For measured B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin), Adaçayı (Kuru) has 0.34 mg and Mantar tozu has 3.2 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adaçayı (Kuru) 76, Mantar tozu 79.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.