Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
279 kcal
Score
87 / 100
Kuru kişniş yaprağı has a higher nutrition quality score (87) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
315 vs 279(-11.4%)
Score Diff
76 vs 87(+14.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru kişniş yaprağı
Higher energy
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Score leader
Kuru kişniş yaprağı
Nutrient split
9 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Adaçayı (Kuru) and Kuru kişniş yaprağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 315.0 kcal and Kuru kişniş yaprağı has 279.0 kcal. The difference is 36.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 76 and 87. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Adaçayı (Kuru) | Kuru kişniş yaprağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 295 µg | 293 µg | -0.7% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.75 mg | 1.252 mg | +66.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.34 mg | 1.5 mg | +341.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.69 mg | 0.606 mg | -77.5% |
| Bakir | — | 2.1 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 31.4 mg | 20 mg | -36.3% |
| Demir | 28.12 mg | 82.43 mg | +193.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 40.3 g | 10.4 g | -74.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 7.48 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 274 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 91 mg | 481 mg | +428.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1714 µg | 1359.5 µg | -20.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 1652 mg | 1246 mg | -24.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.73 g | 52.1 g | -14.2% |
| Kül | 7.93 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 428 mg | 694 mg | +62.1% |
| Mangan | 3.13 mg | 8.8 mg | +181.2% |
| Niasin | 5.72 mg | 10.707 mg | +87.2% |
| Potasyum | 1070 mg | 4466 mg | +317.4% |
| Protein | 10.63 g | 21.93 g | +106.3% |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 211 mg | +1818.2% |
| Su | 7.96 g | 7.3 g | -8.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.01 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 274 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.87 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.75 g | 4.78 g | -62.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.76 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.71 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 4.7 mg | 4.72 mg | +0.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Adaçayı (Kuru) and Kuru kişniş yaprağı.
Kuru kişniş yaprağı has less energy per 100 g (279 kcal versus 315 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Adaçayı (Kuru) has 11 mg and Kuru kişniş yaprağı has 211 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Adaçayı (Kuru) 76, Kuru kişniş yaprağı 87.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.