Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
63 kcal
Score
60 / 100
Kara kuş üzümü has a higher nutrition quality score (60) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
277 vs 63(-77.3%)
Score Diff
14 vs 60(+328.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kara kuş üzümü
Higher energy
Acve Hurması
Score leader
Kara kuş üzümü
Nutrient split
14 - 5 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acve Hurması and Kara kuş üzümü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acve Hurması has 277.0 kcal and Kara kuş üzümü has 63.0 kcal. The difference is 214.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 14 and 60. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acve Hurması | Kara kuş üzümü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 12 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.05 mg | 0.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | 0.05 mg | -16.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | 0.066 mg | -73.6% |
| Bakir | 0.36 mg | 0.086 mg | -76.1% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 140 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.4 mg | 181 mg | +45150.0% |
| Demir | 1 mg | 1.54 mg | +54.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 6.8 g | -2.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 8 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 62 mg | 59 mg | -4.8% |
| Fruktoz | 31.5 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 31.8 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 64 mg | 55 mg | -14.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 75 g | 15.38 g | -79.5% |
| Kül | — | 0.85 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 54 mg | 24 mg | -55.6% |
| Mangan | 0.26 mg | 0.256 mg | -1.5% |
| Niasin | 1.6 mg | 0.3 mg | -81.3% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.398 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 656 mg | 322 mg | -50.9% |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 1.4 g | -44.0% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 2 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 21.3 g | 81.96 g | +284.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.41 g | +2.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 63.3 g | 7.37 g | -88.4% |
| Çinko | 0.44 mg | 0.27 mg | -38.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acve Hurması and Kara kuş üzümü.
Kara kuş üzümü has less energy per 100 g (63 kcal versus 277 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Acve Hurması has 0.4 mg and Kara kuş üzümü has 181 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acve Hurması 14, Kara kuş üzümü 60.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.