Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
52 kcal
Score
19 / 100
Granny Smith elma has a higher nutrition quality score (19) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
277 vs 52(-81.2%)
Score Diff
14 vs 19(+35.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Granny Smith elma
Higher energy
Acve Hurması
Score leader
Granny Smith elma
Nutrient split
13 - 2 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acve Hurması and Granny Smith elma are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acve Hurması has 277.0 kcal and Granny Smith elma has 52.0 kcal. The difference is 225.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 14 and 19. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acve Hurması | Granny Smith elma | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 3 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.36 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.4 mg | 4.6 mg | +1050.0% |
| Demir | 1 mg | 0.12 mg | -88.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 2.8 g | -60.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 52 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 62 mg | 12 mg | -80.6% |
| Fruktoz | 31.5 g | 5.5 g | -82.5% |
| Glikoz | 31.8 g | 1.8 g | -94.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 2.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 64 mg | 5 mg | -92.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 75 g | 13.6 g | -81.9% |
| Magnezyum | 54 mg | 5 mg | -90.7% |
| Malik asit | — | 800 mg | — |
| Mangan | 0.26 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.6 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 656 mg | 120 mg | -81.7% |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 0.26 g | -89.6% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 2.2 g | — |
| Sitrik asit | — | 15 mg | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 1 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 21.3 g | 85.5 g | +301.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.15 g | -62.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 63.3 g | 9.5 g | -85.0% |
| Çinko | 0.44 mg | 0.04 mg | -90.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acve Hurması and Granny Smith elma.
Granny Smith elma has less energy per 100 g (52 kcal versus 277 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Acve Hurması has 0.4 mg and Granny Smith elma has 4.6 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acve Hurması 14, Granny Smith elma 19.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.