Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
25 kcal
Score
65 / 100
Acur has a higher nutrition quality score (85) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
15 vs 25(+66.7%)
Score Diff
85 vs 65(-23.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acur
Higher energy
Beyaz Lahana
Score leader
Acur
Nutrient split
4 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acur and Beyaz Lahana are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acur has 15.0 kcal and Beyaz Lahana has 25.0 kcal. The difference is 10.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 85 and 65. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acur | Beyaz Lahana | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.027 mg | 0.061 mg | +125.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.033 mg | 0.04 mg | +21.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.124 mg | +210.0% |
| Bakir | 0.041 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 45 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.8 mg | 36.6 mg | +1207.1% |
| Demir | 0.28 mg | 0.47 mg | +67.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 2.5 g | +400.0% |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | 43 µg | +514.3% |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 26 mg | +8.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 16.4 µg | 76 µg | +363.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 40 mg | +150.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.63 g | 5.8 g | +59.8% |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 12 mg | -7.7% |
| Mangan | 0.079 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.098 mg | 0.234 mg | +138.8% |
| Potasyum | 147 mg | 170 mg | +15.6% |
| Protein | 0.65 g | 1.28 g | +96.9% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 18 mg | +800.0% |
| Su | 95.23 g | 92.18 g | -3.2% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 10.7 mg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.11 g | 0.1 g | -9.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.67 g | 3.2 g | +91.6% |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.18 mg | -10.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acur and Beyaz Lahana.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 25 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Acur has 2.8 mg and Beyaz Lahana has 36.6 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acur 85, Beyaz Lahana 65.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.