Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
142 kcal
Score
57 / 100
Tas Kebabı has a higher nutrition quality score (57) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
294 vs 142(-51.7%)
Score Diff
20 vs 57(+185.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tas Kebabı
Higher energy
Acuka (Muhammara)
Score leader
Tas Kebabı
Nutrient split
10 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acuka (Muhammara) and Tas Kebabı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acuka (Muhammara) has 294.0 kcal and Tas Kebabı has 142.0 kcal. The difference is 152.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 20 and 57. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acuka (Muhammara) | Tas Kebabı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 120 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.92 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.14 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 1100 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 15 mg | 6.8 mg | -54.7% |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | 1.75 mg | -2.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.5 g | 1.1 g | -68.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.2 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 35 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | — | 138 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 45 mg | 22 mg | -51.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15 g | 4.8 g | -68.0% |
| Kolesterol | — | 36 mg | — |
| Magnezyum | 60 mg | 21 mg | -65.0% |
| Niasin | — | 3.1 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 450 mg | 320 mg | -28.9% |
| Protein | 4.5 g | 12.8 g | +184.4% |
| Sodyum | 850 mg | 365 mg | -57.1% |
| Su | 48 g | 72.3 g | +50.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.8 g | 2.9 g | +3.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 12.5 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 24 g | 7.9 g | -67.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.5 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.8 g | 2.2 g | -54.2% |
| Çinko | 0.9 mg | 2.35 mg | +161.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acuka (Muhammara) and Tas Kebabı.
Tas Kebabı has less energy per 100 g (142 kcal versus 294 kcal).
For measured Protein, Acuka (Muhammara) has 4.5 g and Tas Kebabı has 12.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acuka (Muhammara) 20, Tas Kebabı 57.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.