Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
304 kcal
Score
2 / 100
Ihlamur Balı has a higher nutrition quality score (2) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
22 vs 304(+1281.8%)
Score Diff
0 vs 2(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ihlamur Balı
Higher energy
Ihlamur Balı
Score leader
Ihlamur Balı
Nutrient split
15 - 2 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı sos and Ihlamur Balı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı sos has 22.0 kcal and Ihlamur Balı has 304.0 kcal. The difference is 282.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 2. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı sos | Ihlamur Balı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 42 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.038 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.16 mg | 0.024 mg | -85.0% |
| Bakir | — | 0.036 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 498 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 34.8 mg | 0.5 mg | -98.6% |
| Demir | 0.48 mg | 0.42 mg | -12.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.4 g | 0.2 g | -85.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.45 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 18 mg | 4 mg | -77.8% |
| Fruktoz | — | 39.5 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 34 g | — |
| Kalsiyum | 14 mg | 6 mg | -57.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.7 g | 82.4 g | +2127.0% |
| Kül | 5.73 g | 0.2 g | -96.5% |
| Magnezyum | 11 mg | 2 mg | -81.8% |
| Maltoz | — | 5.8 g | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.82 mg | 0.12 mg | -85.4% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.068 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 164 mg | 52 mg | -68.3% |
| Protein | 0.95 g | 0.3 g | -68.4% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 1.5 g | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 2640 mg | 4 mg | -99.8% |
| Su | 89.2 g | 17.1 g | -80.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.08 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 10 µg | 2 µg | -80.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.42 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.1 g | 82.12 g | +3810.5% |
| Çinko | 0.22 mg | 0.22 mg | 0.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı sos and Ihlamur Balı.
Acı sos has less energy per 100 g (22 kcal versus 304 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Acı sos has 2.1 g and Ihlamur Balı has 82.12 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı sos 0, Ihlamur Balı 2.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.