Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
114 kcal
Score
0 / 100
Acı paprika has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 114(-59.6%)
Score Diff
71 vs 0(-100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acı paprika
Higher energy
Acı paprika
Score leader
Acı paprika
Nutrient split
14 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı paprika and Soğanlı tuz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı paprika has 282.0 kcal and Soğanlı tuz has 114.0 kcal. The difference is 168.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 0. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı paprika | Soğanlı tuz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2463 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.09 mg | -72.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.23 mg | 0.04 mg | -96.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.09 mg | 0.32 mg | -84.7% |
| Beta Karoten | 26162 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.9 mg | 3.2 mg | +255.6% |
| Demir | 21.14 mg | 1.1 mg | -94.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 34.8 g | 4 g | -88.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 29.1 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | — | 477 kj | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 18 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 314 mg | 85 mg | -72.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 80.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 177 mg | 95 mg | -46.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 53.99 g | 25.1 g | -53.5% |
| Kül | 7.8 g | 67.05 g | +759.6% |
| Magnezyum | 178 mg | 28 mg | -84.3% |
| Mangan | — | 0.28 mg | — |
| Niasin | 10.06 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 2280 mg | 370 mg | -83.8% |
| Protein | 14.14 g | 3.6 g | -74.5% |
| Sodyum | 30 mg | 26200 mg | +87233.3% |
| Su | 8.05 g | 3.9 g | -51.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.08 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.89 g | 0.35 g | -97.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 11.2 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.33 mg | 0.45 mg | -89.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı paprika and Soğanlı tuz.
Soğanlı tuz has less energy per 100 g (114 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Acı paprika has 30 mg and Soğanlı tuz has 26200 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı paprika 71, Soğanlı tuz 0.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.