Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
279 kcal
Score
87 / 100
Kuru kişniş yaprağı has a higher nutrition quality score (87) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 279(-1.1%)
Score Diff
71 vs 87(+22.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru kişniş yaprağı
Higher energy
Acı paprika
Score leader
Kuru kişniş yaprağı
Nutrient split
6 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı paprika and Kuru kişniş yaprağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı paprika has 282.0 kcal and Kuru kişniş yaprağı has 279.0 kcal. The difference is 3.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 87. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı paprika | Kuru kişniş yaprağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2463 µg | 293 µg | -88.1% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 1.252 mg | +279.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.23 mg | 1.5 mg | +22.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.09 mg | 0.606 mg | -71.0% |
| Bakir | — | 2.1 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 26162 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.9 mg | 20 mg | +2122.2% |
| Demir | 21.14 mg | 82.43 mg | +289.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 34.8 g | 10.4 g | -70.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 29.1 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 314 mg | 481 mg | +53.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 80.3 µg | 1359.5 µg | +1593.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 177 mg | 1246 mg | +604.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 53.99 g | 52.1 g | -3.5% |
| Kül | 7.8 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 178 mg | 694 mg | +289.9% |
| Mangan | — | 8.8 mg | — |
| Niasin | 10.06 mg | 10.707 mg | +6.4% |
| Potasyum | 2280 mg | 4466 mg | +95.9% |
| Protein | 14.14 g | 21.93 g | +55.1% |
| Sodyum | 30 mg | 211 mg | +603.3% |
| Su | 8.05 g | 7.3 g | -9.3% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 274 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.89 g | 4.78 g | -62.9% |
| Çinko | 4.33 mg | 4.72 mg | +9.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı paprika and Kuru kişniş yaprağı.
Kuru kişniş yaprağı has less energy per 100 g (279 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Acı paprika has 0.9 mg and Kuru kişniş yaprağı has 20 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı paprika 71, Kuru kişniş yaprağı 87.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.