Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
118 kcal
Score
0 / 100
Acı paprika has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 118(-58.2%)
Score Diff
71 vs 0(-100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acı paprika
Higher energy
Acı paprika
Score leader
Acı paprika
Nutrient split
14 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı paprika and Kereviz tuzu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı paprika has 282.0 kcal and Kereviz tuzu has 118.0 kcal. The difference is 164.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 0. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı paprika | Kereviz tuzu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2463 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.1 mg | -69.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.23 mg | 0.11 mg | -91.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.09 mg | 0.07 mg | -96.7% |
| Bakir | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 26162 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.9 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Demir | 21.14 mg | 13.5 mg | -36.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 34.8 g | 3.6 g | -89.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 29.1 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 314 mg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 80.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 177 mg | 372 mg | +110.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 53.99 g | 12.3 g | -77.2% |
| Kül | 7.8 g | 71 g | +810.3% |
| Magnezyum | 178 mg | 132 mg | -25.8% |
| Mangan | — | 0.6 mg | — |
| Niasin | 10.06 mg | 0.9 mg | -91.1% |
| Potasyum | 2280 mg | 420 mg | -81.6% |
| Protein | 14.14 g | 5.4 g | -61.8% |
| Sodyum | 30 mg | 28000 mg | +93233.3% |
| Su | 8.05 g | 3 g | -62.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.5 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.89 g | 7.5 g | -41.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.33 mg | 2 mg | -53.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı paprika and Kereviz tuzu.
Kereviz tuzu has less energy per 100 g (118 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Acı paprika has 30 mg and Kereviz tuzu has 28000 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı paprika 71, Kereviz tuzu 0.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.