Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
311 kcal
Score
77 / 100
Kakule tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (77) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 311(+10.3%)
Score Diff
71 vs 77(+8.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kakule tohumu
Higher energy
Kakule tohumu
Score leader
Kakule tohumu
Nutrient split
12 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı paprika and Kakule tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı paprika has 282.0 kcal and Kakule tohumu has 311.0 kcal. The difference is 29.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 77. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı paprika | Kakule tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2463 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.2 mg | -39.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.23 mg | 0.18 mg | -85.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.09 mg | 0.23 mg | -89.0% |
| Bakir | — | 0.38 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 26162 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.9 mg | 21 mg | +2233.3% |
| Demir | 21.14 mg | 13.97 mg | -33.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 34.8 g | 28 g | -19.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 29.1 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 314 mg | 178 mg | -43.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 80.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 177 mg | 383 mg | +116.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 53.99 g | 68.47 g | +26.8% |
| Kül | 7.8 g | 5.78 g | -25.9% |
| Magnezyum | 178 mg | 229 mg | +28.7% |
| Mangan | — | 28 mg | — |
| Niasin | 10.06 mg | 1.1 mg | -89.1% |
| Potasyum | 2280 mg | 1119 mg | -50.9% |
| Protein | 14.14 g | 10.76 g | -23.9% |
| Sodyum | 30 mg | 18 mg | -40.0% |
| Su | 8.05 g | 8.28 g | +2.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.58 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.87 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.89 g | 6.7 g | -48.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.43 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.33 mg | 7.47 mg | +72.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı paprika and Kakule tohumu.
Acı paprika has less energy per 100 g (282 kcal versus 311 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Acı paprika has 0.9 mg and Kakule tohumu has 21 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı paprika 71, Kakule tohumu 77.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.